Legal Opinion

Poland v. Hollander

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demubbers by the defendant Arthur Schuler to three separate causes of action set forth in an amended complaint, the demurrer in each case being upon'the ground of failure to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a 'cause of action.

1Opinion of the Court

Giegerich, J".

The first cause of action, so far as it is necessary to quote therefrom, claims the amount of $4,173.00 for commissions alleged to be due “ by reason of the fact that the defendants employed the plaintiffs as their agent at the agreed rate of one per cent, commission upon the proceeds of goods shipped to or sold hy the plaintiffs as §uch agent-, and that the said goods were so shipped to and sold hy the said plaintiffs, and that the said amount has been duly demanded, and that no part thereof has been duly paid.” It should he noted that, according to the plaintiffs’ own…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. National Citizens' Bank v. . ToplitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Wallace v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Sampson v. Grand Rapids School Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clifton Shirting Co. v. Bronne Shirt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Fletcher v. CrichtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API