Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Clifton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1927Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order directing clerk of the county of Kings to tax costs and disbursements, and to insert such costs and disbursements, as taxed, in the judgment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. It is not material whether defendant was served in New York county or elsewhere, since plaintiff, a resident of Kings county, was not called upon to bring his action in the City Court of New York, as constituted in 1925, to preserve his right to costs under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 1474 of the Civil Practice Act. (Waldstreicher v. Solomon, 127 App. Div. 364; Burgdorf v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waldstreicher v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API