Legal Opinion

Huskey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1952No. 25437Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Second Motiqn for Rehearing

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

It is now shown by supplemental transcript that the judgment as entered in the minutes of the trial court does not contain the verdict of the jury. Appellant again moves for rehearing and dismissal of the appeal because of the absence of a *133verdict in the judgment as entered in the trial court.

Appellant directs our attention to Art. 766, C.C.P., which provides that a judgment must he entered of record and must contain, “8. The verdict” and relies upon Wheeless v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 68, 150 S. W.2d 806, as holding such a judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheeless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API