Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. Becker

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 6, 2000Published

1DissentParness, P. J.

I would affirm the order of dismissal because tenant’s alleged violation of the lease provision at issue does not provide any basis for a possessory proceeding. *606Section 235-f of the Real Property Law does not create “an affirmative right of action for landlords to enforce occupancy limitations” (Capital Holding Co. v Stavrolakes, 242 AD2d 240, 243, affd 92 NY2d 1009). Therefore, merely stating in the lease that the premises may be occupied “only in accordance with Real Property Law §235-f’ adds nothing since the statute is permissive, not restrictive, and is targeted against landlords who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Capital Holding Co. v. StavrolakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API