Lundstrom v. Giacomo

I see some difference between this case and Lind v. G. N. Ry. Co. 171 Minn. 486, 214 N. W. 763. In that case the distance between the bridge piers was only six inches less than the width required by statute, and the car came head-on against the pier so that the radiator or center part of the front of the car struck the pier. Had the opening between the piers been six inches wider so as to comply with the statute the accident would have occurred just the same. The six inches more space, even if all on the side where the accident occurred, could not have prevented the accident. In the present…