Floyd v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The sole issue in this case is whether the appellant, who was incarcerated in prison after being convicted on another charge, was afforded a speedy trial as defined by the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, Art. VIII, Speedy Trial, Vol. 4A (Repl. 1977 and Supp. 1983).
The time for trial commenced running on August 25, 1981, the date appellant was incarcerated in jail to await trial on this charge. A.R.Cr.P. Rule 28.2. Appellant remained in jail awaiting trial until January 21, 1982 when he was incarcerated in prison pursuant to conviction on another charge. He was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Cooper v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984