Wisdom v. Nickels
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Chief Justice.
This is a negligence action wherein the common issues of negligence and contributory negligence were presented and charged to the jury. Their verdict favored plaintiff with damages. Defendants appeal from the resulting final judgment. We affirm.
In seeking a reversal defendants ask us to assess the facts and from them to decide as a matter of law either that defendants were free of actionable negligence or that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. We have reviewed and con-*653elude that the verdict was supported by substantial competent evidence and the jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nelson v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Bessett v. HackettSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Preger v. GomorySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Sims v. Apperson Chemicals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Melton v. EstesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Ellison v. CribbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Zimmerman v. LanglaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971