Legal Opinion

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1916No. 30364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

In Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. United States, 104 U. S., 680, it was held that where the railroad company had a contract for a term of four years at a stipulated price to carry the mails the price could not be reduced during the *432term by the Post Office Department without the former’s consent. That road was a land-grant road; and in Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. case, 104 U. S., 687, the same ruling was made. In each of said cases an attempt had been made by the Postmaster General to reduce the compensation stated in the contract because of the direction to do so contained in the act of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API