Legal Opinion

Kolsky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1966No. 5820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Chief Judge.

The appellants, defendants below, appeal the judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding them guilty of buying and receiving stolen property.

The appellants’ point on appeal, that the prosecutor’s comment on the defendants’ failure to testify constituted fundamental error which denied defendants’ right to a fair and impartial trial guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States as applied to the states, has rperit.

Based upon the decisions and opinions of the Florida Supreme Court, in King v. State, Fla. 1962, 143 So.2d 458; Diecidue v. State, Fla.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trafficante v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Diecidue v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Watkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Mims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Osgood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API