Legal Opinion
Wilder v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2010No. ED 93032PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.
Introduction
Garland Wilder (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no clear error in the motion court’s ruling, we affirm.
Background
On May 26, 2005, the State of Missouri (State) filed a complaint against Movant charging him with one count of burglary in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 2000 2 , and one count of statutory sodomy in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.064, relating to an alleged incident early that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- State v. McTushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Romell Bates v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Anthony Wallace v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.