Amacher v. State of Tennessee, The
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JENNA R. AMACHER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:21-cv-00638 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14, “Motion”), supported by an accompanying Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 17, “Response”), and Defendants did not file a reply. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Jenna…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.