Legal Opinion

Amacher v. State of Tennessee, The

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 14, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00638Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JENNA R. AMACHER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:21-cv-00638 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14, “Motion”), supported by an accompanying Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 17, “Response”), and Defendants did not file a reply. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Jenna…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API