Jusino v. Masjuán

Me. Justice 'Oóedova Davila

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

The plaintiff-appellee moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason, among others, that notice of the appeal was not served on Ramón S. Pesquera, plaintiff’s attorney, as appears from the record. The appellants argue, in opposition, that notice was duly served on the plaintiff and that, according to section 296 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notice of the appeal may he served on the adverse party or on its attorney, it not being an indispensable requisite that notice be served on the latter if it has been served on the party.

In…