Legal Opinion

Rosenthal-Block China Corp. v. Johann Haviland China Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered September 27, 1960, as resettled by order, entered November 4, 1960, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs-appellants, and motion by defiendan ts-respondents to strike paragraphs 11, 12, 14, 27 and 41 as sham is denied, with $10 costs. As a general rule, a plaintiff may “ determine in his own mind the legal effect of the written contract or other document upon which his cause of action is founded, and plead its legal effect as he understands it”. (United *916States Print. & Lithograph Co. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santasiero v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Murphy v. New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API