Legal Opinion

State v. Rohart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1901No. Nos. 12,636 — (15)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of a breach of an ordinance of the board of park commissioners of said city, in driving a' wagon having tires less than sis inches wide and together with its load weighing more than two thousand pounds, on Lyndale avenue boulevard. From an order, Kerr. J., denying a motion for a new trial defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

An ordinance of the board of park commissioners of the city of Minneapolis provided that no vehicle which, together with its *258load, weighed more than two thousand pounds, and had tires less than six inches wide, should pass over or enter upon any of the parkways of the city. Defendant was convicted of violating this ordinance in July, 1900, by driving upon Lyndale avenue with a wagon equipped with tires 3J inches wide, and carrying a load of over two thousand pounds. Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial, and claims in this court that the conviction ought not to be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Parker v. FrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API