Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fraternal Order of Police, Colorado Lodge 19 v. City of Commerce City

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 10, 2000No. 99SC85Published

1DissentChief Justice Mullarkey

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the provisions of Commerce City’s charter providing for binding interest arbitration in collective bargaining agreement negotiations between the City and its police officers violate article XXI, section 4 of the Colorado Constitution. The majority’s conclusion that the binding interest arbitration provision is constitutional is contrary to both the text of article XXI, section 4 and our precedent.

I

The facts underlying this dispute are set forth in the majority’s opinion. I recount only those most relevant to my analysis.

A recent amendment to Commerce…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Protect Our Mountain Environment, Inc. v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Town of Holyoke v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Greeley Police Union v. City Council of GreeleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Salt Lake City v. International Ass'n of FirefightersUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API