Legal Opinion

State v. Seidenbach

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1941No. A-9710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

On March 20th, 1987, an action was commenced in the court of common pleas, Tulsa county, by filing an information, entitled: “State of Oklahoma ys. J. L. Seidenback, Carl Seidenback and L. H. Thrall, defendants.” To this information said defendants interposed a general demurrer. The record shows that on January 26, 1939, the state confessed said demurrer to be well taken; thereupon the court sustained the demurrer and directed that a new information be filed. On January 28, 1939, an information, entitled: “Amended Information for obstructing work of Labor Officials,” was filed in said court.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. State v. SimmonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. State v. FosterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. State v. LumleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Pantazos v. City of El RenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. STATE v. CRAWFORDCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API