Legal Opinion

Thompson v. National Pacific Insurance

High Court of American Samoa

Decided March 12, 1992No. AP No. 25-90Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, J.:

Ernest Thompson appeals from summary judgment in favor of National Pacific Insurance (NPI) denying coverage for damage resulting *86to Thompson’s pickup, which was driven by Thompson’s intoxicated brother without Thompson’s consent.

Thompson is the owner of a pickup truck which was insured by NPI. While visiting the island, Thompson’s brother took the pickup truck without Thompson’s knowledge and became involved in a single vehicle collision. Thompson’s brother was cited and convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and operating a vehicle without a valid driver’s license.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dale E. Kraus and Rosetta M. Kraus, Husband and Wife Cindy D. Kraus, Individually and Todd W. Montgomery, Individually v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Stanley H. Fried, Jr., and Richard Strasser v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Water West, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Entek Corporation, a Texas Corporation, and James Edward TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Gustin v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API