Hegwer v. Kiff & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Action brought December 5,1881, in the district court of Reno county, by Kiff & Qo. and G. W. Hardy against Hegwer, to recover $500, not then due. The plaintiffs in connection with their action obtained an order of attachment. March 4, 1882, the district judge overruled defendant’s motion to discharge the attachment. This ruling he brings here for review. Other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The question involved in this case is one of fact, and the testimony wholly by affidavits. After a careful examination of all the affidavits introduced upon the motion to discharge the attachment, we are forced to the conclusion that there was not evidence sufficient to establish that the plaintiff in error (defendant below) on or before the 3d day of December, 1881, had sold and conveyed, or otherwise disposed of his property, or any part thereof, with the fraudulent intent to cheat or defraud his creditors, or hinder and delay them in the collection of their debts; or that he was about to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conner v. Commissioners of Rice CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilpin v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Tootle v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Hatch v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
- Champion Machine Co. v. Updyke & StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892