Legal Opinion

Tinwood, N.V. v. Figueredo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 5, 1988No. Nos. 88-227, 88-283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Tinwood, N.V., a co-defendant below, appeals from an order transferring a cross-claim it brought against co-defendants, Figueredo and others, to the Orange County Circuit Court. We reverse on the authority of the rule established in Becker, Poliakoff & Streitfeld v. Sachs, 404 So.2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Zelikoff, 303 So.2d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); and McCue v. Lane, 228 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), that a trial court simply lacks the authority, whether on grounds of convenience or otherwise, to excise and transfer only a portion of a pending action to another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCue v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. ZelikoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Becker, Polliakoff & Streitfeld, P.A. v. SachsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API