Sturma v. General Installation Co. of Missouri-Illinois
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
This is a workers’ compensation case wherein the employer and insurer appeal. Although their brief raises three points, they basically raise two issues. First, that the Commission erred in awarding permanent partial disability because the award was not supported by the facts as found. We disagree, because the Commission had sufficient competent evidence in the record *587to support the award and thus, we cannot set aside the award. Haggard v. Synder Construction Company, 479 S.W.2d 142, 144-145 (Mo.App.W.D.1972). Second, that the Commission erred in allowing a multiplicity factor in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Page v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Petersen v. Central Pattern Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Eagle v. City of St. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Webb v. Norbert Markway Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Haggard v. Synder Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Walter Adams v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022