Texas Indemnity Insurance v. Clark
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge GERMAN
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
This action is one under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the only question necessary for us to decide is this: Was defendant in error, Floyd Clark, injured while in the course of his employment. The evidence is practically undisputed on all material points. We will briefly narrate the essential facts.
The defendant in error was an employee of the Prairie Pipe Line Company, which was a subscriber under the law, and plaintiff in error, Texas Indemnity Insurance Company, was the insurer. Defendant in error was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Ætna Life Ins. v. BurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. ThetfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- &198tna Life Ins. Co. v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Blackwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Brown v. Palmer Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Fritzmeier v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Austin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.