Legal Opinion

State v. Fury

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 26, 2006No. 01-04-00906-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

A jury found appellee, Telly Wayne Fury, guilty of the offense of aggravated assault on a public servant 1 and assessed punishment at confinement for 60 years. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for new trial. In three issues, the State contends that (1) the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for new trial on a ground not pleaded by appellee, (2) the evidence was legally and factually sufficient to sustain appellee’s conviction, and (3) there was no Brady 2 violation to sup port granting appellee’s motion for new trial. 3 We vacate the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dickey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Victor Hamilton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  3. Alfred James Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
  4. Anthony Lee Hardeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Anthony Lee Hardeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API