Legal Opinion

Haley v. Schleis

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1982No. 13465PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Justice.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a divorce decree automatically severs an ex-spouse’s beneficiary interest in an insurance policy. We hold that it does not.

Kathleen Haley and Stephen Schleis were married in 1975. During the marriage Stephen took out two insurance policies through his employer, naming Kathleen as beneficiary. On November 6, 1979, Stephen and Kathleen were divorced. The policies involved were term insurance and the period of coverage purchased with premium payments from the community funds had ended shortly after the divorce. Kathleen therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Redd v. BrookeNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Romero v. MelendezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Dudley v. Franklin Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Harris v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund v. Laurine Brown (Lamar), and Dessie Brown, and All UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Lyman Lumber Company v. E. John Hill, Cassie Hill and Seth HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Messier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Banner Life Insurance v. Mark Wallace Dixson Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API