Legal Opinion
Kalinowski v. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Our inquiry upon these appeals is directed to the proximate cause of personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. Is the proof sufficient to establish the liability of each of the two defendants who are appellants before us?
In July, 1930, the defendant, appellant, Bock Asphalt & Construction Co., Inc., purchased a new four-wheel motor dump truck with a rated capacity of one and one-half tons. To increase its usefulness the owner commissioned the defendant Truck Equipment Co., Inc., to enlarge the truck body and install an additional rear axle and two additional rear wheels. The steel-…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- White v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Digelormo v. WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Wyman v. Pan American Airways, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
- Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- General Motors Corporation v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Roshan L. Mehra, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits Which Were of Rajinder K. Mehra v. Roberta Bentz and Rudolph J. BentzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.