Legal Opinion
Ellison v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 1, 2002No. 5D01-3332Published
1Per curiam
The denial of defendant Willie James Ellison’s seventh Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed.1 Three Rule 3.800(a) motions ago, this court warned Ellison that it was improper to reargue a ground already considered and rejected on the merits. Ellison v. State, 703 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA *8261998). Yet Ellison has persisted in doing just that.
Based upon his numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Ellison is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions pertaining to his convictions and sentences in Ninth Circuit Court No. CR91-10730…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Jackson v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Carnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Ellison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Ellison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998