Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 4, 2017No. 4D15-3974PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKlingensmith, J.
Lorenzo and Lahoma Dixon (“Borrowers”) appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered against them. Because the initial plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Bank”), sent a default letter to Borrow*900ers that failed to substantially comply with paragraph 22 of the mortgage, we reverse.1
After Borrowers defaulted on their mortgage loan payment, Bank’s law firm sent them a default letter on Bank’s behalf stating that “[pjursuant to the terms of the promissory Note and Mortgage, [Bank] has accelerated all sums due and owing, which means that the entire principal balance and all other sums recoverable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ricardo Ortiz, Nuria Almeida and Frank Padron v. PNC Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. MilamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Reilly v. ReillyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- SDS Autos, Inc. v. ChrzanowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Dominko v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark, Jr. v. Clark, Sr., Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024