Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Oakdale Realty and Water Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1970No. 19003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This action was brought to recover approximately 162 acres of land and for damages for deprivation of use. The defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, contending that the complaint itself established that the plaintiffs have been divested of their interest in the land, and that no facts are alleged which would establish an interest in the plaintiffs. The trial judge sustained the demurrers of the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The complaint, which must be deemed true for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta R. R. v. GarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  3. Gunter v. Seivern & Knoxville R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Livingston v. RuffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerby ex rel. Estate of Dooley v. Associated Petroleum Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Twitty v. Key Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API