Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1987No. Docket 94057PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on leave granted. It concerns an issue in a pending retrial: whether evidence of defendant’s psychological makeup is admissible to allow the jury to evaluate the voluntariness of his statements to the police. The trial court excluded the expert testimony on this issue. We reverse and remand.

Defendant has been charged with felony murder, assault with intent to commit armed robbery, and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony resulting from the April 8, 1979, death of a convenience store proprietor. Defendant was sixteen years old at the time and the probate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. State v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API