Mobile School Comm'rs v. Putnam
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before Hon. A. C. Felder. This was a bill in equity exhibited in the chancery court of Mobile, by W. G. Clark and other persons claiming to be “ the Mobile school commissioners,” a corporation created and recognized by the laws of Alabama, against G. L. Putnam, N. B. Cloud, superintendent of public instruction, R. M. Reynolds, State auditor, and Arthur Bingham, State treasurer, praying for an injunction to prevent the payment…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before Hon. A. C. Felder. This was a bill in equity exhibited in the chancery court of Mobile, by W. G. Clark and other persons claiming to be “ the Mobile school commissioners,” a corporation created and recognized by the laws of Alabama, against G. L. Putnam, N. B. Cloud, superintendent of public instruction, R. M. Reynolds, State auditor, and Arthur Bingham, State treasurer, praying for an injunction to prevent the payment to the defendant Putnam of certain moneys in the State treasury, which they allege are properly payable to them as such…
1Opinion
The following response was made to appellants’ petition for a rehearing at the present term by—
PEOK, O. J.
This case was disposed of at the last term, affirming the decree of the chancellor, dissolving the injunction granted on the filing of appellants’ bill.
A petition for a re-hearing has been filed, and as the court had but little time then for the consideration of the questions involved, and none, for writing out the reasons that led to its conclusions, we propose now, in connection with the application for a rehearing, to give the case a more careful examination.
The first question then…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dunlap v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845