Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Blankenship

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1989No. 89-140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

The plaintiff, John Hughes, in his capacity as administrator of the Western Conference of Teamsters’ Pension Fund, initiated this suit to recover $45,427.39 owed by the defendant Jim Blankenship as a union contractor for unpaid contributions to the Pension Fund (Fund), plus damages and interest. Blankenship defends on the grounds that the collective bargaining agreement he entered with the Teamsters Union was to be applicable only to employees working on non-residential patching and paving jobs and that the collective bargaining agreement actually entered was entered into by mistake. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William Waggoner v. Robert Lee DallaireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Audit Services, Inc. v. Harvey Bros. ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Audit Services, Inc. v. Clark Bros. ContractorsMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Audit Services, Inc. v. HousemanMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. BlankenshipMontana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API