Waterman v. Caton
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ of Error to the County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. P. K. Leland, Judge, presiding. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This writ of error brings before us a judgment entered in the court below, in term time, by confession, upon a warrant of attorney. The error assigned is, that there is a variance between the note described in the warrant of attorney and that upon which the judgment was entered. This question is not properly presented by the record. The judgment having been entered in term time, the note and warrant of attorney could not become a part of the record, unless introduced into it by a bill of exceptions. In this case there was no bill of exceptions taken. The rule laid down in the case…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Boyles v. ChytrausIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Giddings v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Davis v. WirthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Bannon v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1877
- Davis v. MosbacherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.