Legal Opinion

Hoadena Ingram v. Habeas Corpus

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 14, 2021No. 5:20-cv-01527Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOADENA INGRAM, Case No. 5:20-cv-01527-JVS-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DISMISSING ACTION 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 HABEAS CORPUS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 19 On July 30, 2020, the Court received and filed Petitioner Hoadena Ingram’s 20 (“Petitioner”) pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State 21 Custody pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) Petitioner 22 challenges a 2013 sentencing enhancement that was based on prior…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API