Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 17, 2016No. 14-CV-4717 (FB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff London market insurance companies (“LMI”) seek to compel defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) to re-produce two documents used by LMI as deposition exhibits that Amtrak has since “clawed back” after asserting attorney-client privilege and work-product protections. For the following reasons, LMI’s motion is granted.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Court presumes familiarity with the factual background of this extensive litiga*199tion. Pertinent-to the instant motion, on August 8, 2014, LMI initiated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Francisco v. Verizon South, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bama Companies, Inc., The v. Stahlbush Island Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  2. City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  3. Douglas v. City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. In re ACTOS Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. LifeBio, Inc. v. Eva Garland Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API