Legal Opinion
State v. Lake Winnipesaukee Resort, LLC
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 17, 2009No. 2008-724PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The legal issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether this action is timely in light of the common law doctrine nullum tempus occurrit regi, or “time does not run against the king,” and the general three-year statute of limitations, RSA 508:4 (1997). We affirm the denial of the respondents’ motion to dismiss and remand.
The relevant facts appear within the interlocutory appeal statement. Respondent Lake Winnipesaukee Resort, LLC (LWR) sought to construct a golf course in New Durham. It retained respondent Peerless Golf, Inc. (Peerless) in May 2001 as general contractor. Early in the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. KaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Waterfield v. Meredith Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Billewicz v. RansmeierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- City of Rochester v. Marcel A. Payeur, Inc. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.