Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thurman v. Pruitt Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1994No. A93A2200Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

1.1 would find that the affidavit provided by Thurman was insufficient because it failed to provide “the factual basis” for Thurman’s claim, as required by OCGA § 9-11-9.1. The affiant nurse acknowledges that she reviewed no medical records, but instead relied upon “my understanding gained from information given to Attorney Deborah Green by Mr. Thurman’s family.” “The affiant may review the medical records, take the relevant facts therein to be true, and restate those facts in the affidavit to provide the basis for the expert opinion.” (Emphasis supplied.) Ulbrich v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Associated Health Systems, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Ulbrich v. BattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API