Legal Opinion
DeGourney v. Mulzac
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 29, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Noreen Mulzac appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated August 11, 2000, which denied her motion, inter alia, to compel the plaintiff to comply with her notice of discovery and inspection dated May 1, 2000.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which sought discovery of the piece of paper upon which the license plate number of the alleged offending vehicle had been written by an eyewitness to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zellman v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Castillo v. Henry Schein, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kane v. Her-Pet Refrigeration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rosado v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Romeo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moak v. RaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Daniels v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Valencia v. Obayashi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011