Legal Opinion

Haag v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 20, 2023No. 3:22-cv-03130Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 REBECCA HAAG, Case No. 22-cv-03130-TSH 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 10 v. JUDGMENT 11 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Rebecca Haag sued Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America 16 (“Unum”) to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under a policy issued by Unum and 17 governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 18

1001–1461. On May 27, 2022, Haag filed this action under 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
Jack FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.