Legal Opinion

Brookside-Pratt Mining Co. v. Booth

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 7 Div. 426PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was to recover damages tor an assault and battery alleged to have been committed by defendant’s agents upon plaintiff while he was at defendant’s commissary. The trial was had on the second count of the complaint to which demurrer was overruled. The assignment of error challenging the ruling on demurrer is not insisted upon. Georgia Cotton Co. v. Lee, 196 Ala. 599, 72 South. 158.

The second, third, and fourth assignments of r error challenge the sustaining of demurrers to pleas A, B, and E. Demurrers were overruled to pleas C and D. The insistence of appellant is that the latter pleas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Hines v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. New Morgan County Building & Loan Ass'n v. PlemmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Thomason v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Motes v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Scroggins v. Alabama Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Penn v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ramirez v. ChavezArizona Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API