Legal Opinion

Dunkley v. Shoemate

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1997No. 28PA97PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunkley v. ShoemateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Dunkley v. ShoemateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998