Legal Opinion

Craft v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1970No. 44978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. “Upon proof alone of recent possession of stolen goods, the law does not put the burden upon the possessor of the stolen goods of proving that he was not guilty of receiving the goods knowingly.” Bird v. State, 72 Ga. App. 843 (4) (35 SE2d 483), and see Barron v. State, 109 Ga. App. 786 (137 SE2d 690).

2. “The guilty knowledge of the receiver, being in most cases not susceptible of direct proof, may be shown by circumstantial evidence, and if from all of the circumstances ‘the jury can conclude that the receiver did have good reason, as a reasonable person, to believe or suspect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Calhoun v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strother Ford, Inc. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Strother Ford, Inc. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API