Filardo v. National Union Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, P. J.
This is an action on a New York standard fire insurance policy. The policy contains the following provisionUnless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto this company shall not be liable for loss or damage occurring * * * (b) While the hazard is increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the insured.” The answer alleges as a defense that the hazard was increased by the installation and operation by the insured of a still in the cellar of the premises and that the fire in question occurred while such increased hazard existed.
At the trial the plaintiff admitted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mead v. . the Northwestern Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Ertischek v. . New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. of ManchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ertischek v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeVanzo v. Newark InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Taverna v. Palatine Insurance Co. of LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930