Legal Opinion

Hair v. Hales

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1989No. 8812DC1272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

The entry of summary judgment is appropriate only “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The burden of establishing the absence of any issues as to a material fact rests on the moving party. Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343, 222 *433S.E.2d 392 (1976). An issue of fact is “material” for purposes of determining whether a motion for summary judgment should be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gouch v. RotunnoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  2. Irwin v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API