Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Elwood Grain Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions
•Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Eon. O. A. Mosfflttft, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.
This is a suit for damages alleged to have been incurred by reason of the failure of the defendant to comply, with the terms of the following contract:
“Contract for Sale. — Eiwood Grain Company.
Unless specially agreed otherwise, this contract is subject in all respects to the rules and regulations of the St. Joseph, Missouri, Board of Trade.
St. Joseph, Mo., Dec. 26, 1907..
“Barnett & O’Neal, Alexandria, La.
Dear sir: We hereby confirm sale to you per telegram of Dec. 24th, of 20,000 bushels No. 2 Mixed Corn, 62c Jany. Alexandria St. Joseph weights and St. Joseph grades to govern settlement.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bradley v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Bowen v. LazalereSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Eastern Forge Co. v. CorbinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Creve Coeur Lake Ice Co. v. TammMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Pres't. Directors & Co. of the Bank v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1843
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. PotashnickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Ames Canning Co. v. Dexter Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Great Eastern Oil Co. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Continental Grain Co. v. Simpson Feed Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951