Legal Opinion

In re Reapportionment of Towns of Woodbury & Worcester

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 13, 2004No. 02-304PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Petitioners, citizens of the towns of Woodbury and Worcester, challenge the Legislature’s 2002 reapportionment of voting districts for the Vermont House of Representatives on grounds that placement of their towns in the new Lamoille-Washington-1 district violates constitutional and statutory requirements. We deny petitioners’ challenge.

¶ 2. To maintain equal representation in the General Assembly, the constitution requires the Legislature to reapportion its voting districts after each decennial census. See Vt. Const, ch. II, § 73. While the primary constitutional criterion is numerical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. In Re Senate Bill 177Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. In re Reapportionment of Town of MontgomerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Turnley v. Town of VernonVermont Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API