Legal Opinion
State v. Holcomb
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 10, 2014No. 32155-0-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 Daniel Holcomb appeals his second degree assault conviction. He contends he was denied his constitutional right to jury unanimity. Under well-settled authority, we disagree. Mr. Holcomb next contends the accomplice liability statute is unconstitutional because it criminalizes constitutionally protected speech. We hold RCW 9A.08.020 is constitutional. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Mr. Holcomb and Anthony Sumait approached Charles Burnett’s home, possibly to inquire about a truck for sale. Mr. Burnett was standing outside when the two men approached him. Jennifer Mingler, Mr. Burnett’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Justin Dewayne McphersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Charles v. Farnsworth, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington, V Shari A. Brentin And Anthony D. BrentinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.