Legal Opinion

Boozer v. Nash

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint for land. Before Judge Russell. Gwinnett superior ' court. September 18, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, P. J.

Certain land was set apart to Martha W. Boozer, widow of George W. Boozer, and her five minor children, jointly, as a year’s support. Subsequently she sold and conveyed the land to Coggins, and she and the children moved away and Cog-*407gins was put into possession. He, in turn, sold and conveyed to Nash, who paid full value for the same. The sale by the widow was not for the support and maintenance of' herself and children, but the evidence in the case does not show that Coggins or' Nash had knowledge of this fact. After three of the children had become of age, they, and the two remaining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferris v. Van Ingen & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Howard v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Vandigrift v. PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bridges v. BarbreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Whitfield v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Turman v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Gaddy v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API