Legal Opinion

Kargman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action by Samuel Kargman and Valentine L. Shannon to recover damages for personal injuries and by Dora Kargman for property damage, plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for an order (a) vacating and setting aside a settlement of their respective claims, and (b) restoring the case to the calendar for trial. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of directing that the action be restored to the trial calendar without loss of position. Here there was at most an accord but no satisfaction, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Bruder v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Langlois v. LangloisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Palm Beach Royal Hotel, Inc. v. BreeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Kahn v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  4. Peguero v. GrantCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  5. Accarino v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API