Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1895No. 753PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

The fact that one of the compurgators to the affidavit for change of venue is a local agent of the railway company does not make him a party to the litigation, nor does that prevent his being a “credible person.” The court erred in holding such agent was incapable for that reason to make the proper affidavit, and in refusing to grant the application for change of venue. Railway v. Allen, 26 S. W. Rep., 434; Railway v. Hawkins, this day decided by this court.

The appellant requested the following special charge, to wit: “If the plaintiff and her companions were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API