Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bolding v. Bolding

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 21734Published

1DissentNess, Justice

I find sufficent evidence in the record to establish a material change of circumstances to justify a change of custody and dissent.

We have held, “[wjhile there is no fixed standard for determination of what constitutes a material or substantial change ... it is sufficient if there is a showing of such change of circumstances as affects the welfare of a child.” Raven v. Cecil, 262 S. C. 509 at 513, 205 S. E. (2d) 837 (1974).

Thus the only issue before us here is whether there has been a change of circumstances which would affect the welfare of the parties’ eleven year old son.

The record reveals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. ArdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Poliakoff v. PoliakoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Guinan v. GuinanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Raven v. CecilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API