Paich v. Akron

OPINION

By WASHBURN, PJ.

A transcript of the evidence introduced in the Common Pleas Court was introduced in this court, supplemented by some evidence taken in this court. It is apparent from that evidence that ihs assessment in this case was not made until after the improvement of said street, which consisted of widening and paving of the same, was completed.

We have recently held (in the case of Peterson v Kelser, 15 Abs 69) that under such circumstances the fact that the property owner, upon being notified by publication of the jnaking of said assessment, fail-» *266ed to object to said…